|
Cultural importance of some of the most important families (CIf) in each of the surveyed areas, in descending order of the mean estimated for the whole northwest region (mCIf) |
|||||||
| Family |
SAN |
CAU |
PIL |
PIC |
CPO |
MON |
mCIf |
|
|
|||||||
| Rosaceae |
0.84 |
0.80 |
0.64 |
1.79 |
1.73 |
1.94 |
1.29 |
| Lamiaceae |
0.34 |
0.31 |
0.16 |
0.57 |
0.39 |
2.36 |
0.69 |
| Fagaceae |
0.27 |
0.41 |
0.36 |
0.23 |
0.10 |
0.48 |
0.31 |
| Asteraceae |
0.09 |
0.15 |
0.29 |
0.33 |
0.38 |
0.26 |
0.25 |
| Apiaceae |
0.11 |
0.18 |
0.04 |
0.05 |
0.15 |
0.87 |
0.23 |
| Ericaceae |
0.11 |
0.18 |
0.13 |
0.47 |
0.22 |
0.17 |
0.21 |
| Polygonaceae |
0.11 |
0.08 |
0.23 |
0.15 |
0.33 |
0.36 |
0.21 |
| Lauraceae |
0.02 |
0.18 |
0.07 |
0.21 |
0.11 |
0.50 |
0.18 |
| Betulaceae |
0.05 |
0.33 |
0.11 |
0.26 |
0.12 |
0.03 |
0.15 |
| Brassicaceae |
0.14 |
0.08 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
0.10 |
0.33 |
0.11 |
Pardo-de-Santayana et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2007 3:27 doi:10.1186/1746-4269-3-27 |
|||||||